Monday, April 20, 2020

(Digital) Formative Assessment for Live Online Teaching


It is now a month since we started working from home and are in full lockdown. I have been asked many times by teachers, friends and colleagues about assessment in general and how to assess our students  in this new medium, which for most is live online teaching. This has made me reflect about the importance of going back to the basics of assessment and what I have said previously in other blog posts, webinars I have given or conversations I have had – we need to keep focusing on the basic principles of face to face (f2f) teaching as these still apply and build on these so that we continue to make informed decisions about the technology we bring into our lessons while keeping it simple!

I believe that it is important to start by underlining that (online) assessment it too broad a term and that we need to look at it more closely so that we can benefit as teachers from adopting an appropriate approach and suitable strategies. In broad terms, assessment can be summative or formative, where the former is about grades or marks, high stakes exams and in many cases life-changing results. The latter, is about supporting learning, building skills, and in my humble opinion, a personal journey we embark on with our students. Now, I am not saying summative assessment is wrong, I am focusing on what the current circumstances allow for and how I have adapted to it – I am just sharing my ideas here so no point of contention sought! Now, since summative assessment seems to have been put on hold in many institutions from what I hear around my network, and many are trying to adapt by adopting tools or collaborating with websites which offer the possibility to replicate the same summative exam conditions we were used to when teaching f2f, I have been thinking about the wonderful opportunity this situation brings along for us to focus more intently on formative assessment.

In the last MA in Digital Technologies for Language Teaching I completed in 2016 with the University of Nottingham, the module on assessment really caught my attention, mainly because of my involvement as a language assessment specialist with different international boards. In particular, I found useful the distinction between assessment of learning and assessment for learning, summative and formative assessment respectively, and how this distinction can help us make better decisions in the classroom.  Hounsell, Xu and Tai, (2007) in their Balancing assessment of and assessment for learning Guide no 2 helped me better understand formative assessment so I want to share here the 4 strategies for better formative assessment they identified for rebalancing assessment. These are easy to implement and a must-have-awareness-of for teachers, I would argue, during lesson planning.

I  have a preference for visual information so I put the strategies and my examples in the table below. Information in colour under in column comes directly from the guide, and my examples and thoughts about them come in the section below it:

Feedforward assessments
Interconnecting assessment and assignment tasks to create a recursive cycle or feedback loop where feedback can be fed directly into a subsequent task or aid preparation for an exam – feedforward.
Providing feedback on work our students do in the classroom either orally or in writing needs to become feedforward by creating a ‘feedback loop’ (p.4) where they can manipulate our feedback and integrate it into their work. We need to ensure there is a follow up to our feedback to provide opportunities for them to incorporate that feedback into their work and prevent it from just being read and forgotten.
Cumulative coursework
The assignment evolves over a period of time e.g. semester and shows the evolving grasp of the concept by the students via feedback from tutors and other people involved. Can take the form of a portfolio, log or workbook.
Many of you will agree that most of the homework we set is related to exercises in workbooks which come or not with answer keys and which in theory would help students check their own work. We may also provide feedback on their work, but I believe more flexibility could be built into our homework setting routines. For instance, our students could keep an online portfolio of their work, reflections, lesson related research to showcase at the end of each Term (as it is the case for my current institution here the year is divided into 3 terms) or school year.
Better understood expectations and standards
Making students aware of the criteria while valid does not effectively help students to grasp the same concept of quality the teacher holds (Sadler, 1989 in Hounsell et al., 2007). Solution - more interactive briefing and training of students about assessment and expectations e.g. dialogue about assessment, involving students into generation of criteria, opportunities for them to assess own and peers' tasks and also providing training on this.  One possibility is using 'exemplar' sample for students to see and benchmark.
Here, I think we can still do a lot in our classrooms as often feedback focuses on mistakes thus taking a short-term approach rather than creating tasks which clearly highlight what is expected of them along with a model. In this sense, I find Cambridge exam tasks, public assessment criteria descriptors and samples really useful as we can start by building students’ confidence through modelling and clarification of expectations.
Speedier feedback
A fourth strategy for rebalancing assessment aims to increase the impact of feedback by speeding up its provision to and immediacy for students, and so more directly aid their subsequent performance in summative assessments. Computer-based or enhanced assessment is definitely an option and example of how IT can support education in issue-prone areas like this one.
You may be familiar with the idea of ‘hot’ feedback or similar forms where the aim is to provide students with feedback as soon as possible on their performance. This in turn should help them make connections between the content of the task and where they did no succeed in answering the task sooner rather than later. This can be problematic for us teachers when we have large classes we need to provide feedback to, so the next and last section includes some ideas to address this issue.

Where do digital tools fit in all of this?
I am fond of mantras and mine in lockdown is ‘keep it simple’! With this in mind, I thank all the online websites and companies who are providing free services during lockdown as they are indeed providing an opportunity for us to become more acquainted with them. However, as a teacher myself and in line with my mantra, my first choice is those tools which require no subscription now or later and which are available to most. Now, I am fully aware that I do not know all the apps and tools available so in my specific case I am trying to make the most with what I already have while keeping it simple – that is the Google Suite of tools: Docs and Forms (n this article), but also the other tools like Slides, Drawing, etc. These  digital tools allow for great flexibility and can easily lend themselves to ensure a tick on each of the four strategies identified above in very simple ways. For instance:

Google Docs
·      Written homework can become a dialogue between the student and the teacher, one that goes beyond the initial correction and which allows the student to see writing as a process (drafting) rather than a once-written and corrected then done!
·      Once students are comfortable with the step above, move on to groups tasks which require more collaboration following the same steps as above, but applying them for group work.
·      Start using rubrics where students can see the criteria they are assessed against. Start with self-assessment and build their confidence with handling these before moving on to Peer assessment.

Google Forms
·      Exploit the fact that you can turn these into quizzes which are marked automatically to reduce your marking load while also providing immediate feedback to your students on their performance as well as correct answers where they made a mistake.
·      Use these at different stages, in and outside your lesson to gather information about your students’ performance and use this to inform your lesson planning.
·      Recycle them at set times and use the mix questions option to help easily revisit topics without having to re-invent the wheel.
·      I follow Bradley Lands (@MrLands) on Twitter. He is an educator too and has shared a lots of Google Form quizzes he created for formative assessment which can be copied and edited to suit our classrooms which are a great springboard for any teacher wanting to start introducing more formative assessment into their lessons.

In short, whatever you do, try and ensure the four strategies for formative assessment mentioned are part of the activities you design to foster a more positive perception of (formative) assessment by your students and also to pave the way for success in the long term.

References
Hounsell, D., Xu, R. and Tai, C.M., 2007. Balancing assessment of and assessment for learning Guide no 2. Higher Education, (2), p.15.

No comments:

A New Journey Begins - NILE MA in Professional Development for Language Education

It's been a while since my last post on my experience on teaching hybrid lessons during the pandemic - in fact, it's been over a yea...